Deep vein thrombosis on the fourth day of risperidone therapy

  1. Kavitha Konnakkaparambil Ramakrishnan 1 and
  2. Mithila George 2
  1. 1 Department of Psychiatry, Government TD Medical College, Alapuzha, Kerala, India
  2. 2 Department of Psychiatry, Government Medical College, Ernakulam, Cochin, Kerala, India
  1. Correspondence to Dr Kavitha Konnakkaparambil Ramakrishnan; drkavithamadhavan@gmail.com

Publication history

Accepted:16 Feb 2021
First published:05 Mar 2021
Online issue publication:05 Mar 2021

Case reports

Case reports are not necessarily evidence-based in the same way that the other content on BMJ Best Practice is. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice. Please check the date of publication.

Abstract

Deep vein thrombosis has been recognised as a complication of antipsychotic treatment and is reported to be more common with atypical antipsychotics. Risperidone is a second-generation atypical antipsychotic and there have been case reports of risperidone-associated deep vein thrombosis, most of them reporting the complication from 2 weeks to a few months of initiation of therapy. Here, we are reporting a case of deep vein thrombosis in a male patient in his early forties with paranoid schizophrenia, which presented on the fourth day of starting risperidone therapy. This case is being reported to highlight the fact that deep vein thrombosis can occur as early as fourth day of initiation of risperidone therapy, that too at a low dose (2 mg/day). The case also emphasises the importance of monitoring these patients for this rare but potentially serious adverse effect from the first day itself after initiation of a new antipsychotic.

Background

Antipsychotics constitute the first-line treatment of schizophrenia and other primary psychotic disorders. Sedation, extrapyramidal symptoms, constipation and weight gain are some of the common side effects of antipsychotics, but they also cause serious adverse effects like myocarditis and neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Deep vein thrombosis is a less common but serious adverse effect of antipsychotic therapy.

Risperidone is a second-generation atypical antipsychotic, and there have been only a few case reports of risperidone-associated deep vein thrombosis. These have been mostly reported a few weeks to a few months after initiation of therapy. However, deep vein thrombosis in the first few days of starting treatment with risperidone has been rarely reported. Here, we are reporting this case in which the complication was detected on the fourth day of initiation of risperidone. This case also warns us that deep vein thrombosis may not be a dose-related adverse effect and can occur even at a low dose.

Case presentation

A married male in his early forties presented to psychiatry emergency department with history of aggressive behaviour, delusions of persecution, third person auditory hallucinations and reduced social interaction. History was obtained from his wife and it was reliable. Total duration of illness was 12 years. He had a history of poor drug compliance. He had not taken any drug for the past 3 months. Prior to that, the only antipsychotic he had taken in the past 2 years was haloperidol. His symptoms had worsened in the past 1 month. Patient was not having any other comorbidities and was not on any other medication. He was a non-smoker. He gave no history suggestive of deep vein thrombosis in the past. There was no history of any deep vein thrombosis in the family also. His body mass index (BMI) was 23 kg/m2. He was ambulant. After detailed clinical examination, he was diagnosed as having paranoid schizophrenia continuous according to ICD-10 classification. Risperidone 2 mg/day along with trihexyphenidyl 2 mg/day was prescribed and he was sent home the same day. On the fourth day, he came to psychiatry outpatient department with complaints of pain over right calf muscle and inability to walk. He was haemodynamically stable and had no clinical signs of dehydration. His right lower limb was swollen and edematous below knee. He had tenderness over the calf muscles. Homan’s sign was positive. It was confirmed that patient had taken risperidone as prescribed. He had never been physically restrained either at home or in the hospital. The clinical picture pointed towards deep vein thrombosis induced by risperidone, and the drug was immediately stopped. He was started on conventional antipsychotic haloperidol at a dose of 5 mg/day. He was referred to surgery outpatient department for further management.

Investigations

His haemoglobin was 150g/L, total leucocyte count was 5.9 x 109/L and platelet count 350 x 109/L . His random blood sugar was 88 mg/dL. Total cholesterol was 162 mg/dL, high density lipoprotein 46 mg/dL, low density lipoprotein 120 mg/dL and triglycerides 140 mg/dL. Serum sodium was 137 mEq/L and serum potassium was 4.1 mEq/L. Prothrombin time, international normalised ratio (INR) and activated partial thromboplastin time were found to be in normal reference range. His thyroid hormone profile was also in the normal range. D-dimer was 5732 ng/mL (laboratory reference range <500 ng/mL). Duplex ultrasound examination demonstrated deep vein thrombosis involving right popliteal and proximal posterior tibial veins.

Differential diagnosis

Cellulitis involving the right lower limb was a possible alternate diagnosis. This was especially relevant as risperidone has been reported to cause pedal oedema. However, clinical picture and an elevated D-dimer pointed towards deep vein thrombosis. Well’s score for pre-test probability was 4 suggesting deep vein thrombosis as ‘likely’.1 A duplex venous ultrasound scan has a high overall specificity of 93.8% for diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis.1 It can differentiate between oedema with cellulitis and deep vein thrombosis and in this case, it clearly demonstrated thrombosis of right popliteal and proximal posterior tibial veins.

Treatment

Patient was admitted in the general surgery ward and was started on heparin 5000 units bolus intravenously followed by 30 000 units per day as continuous infusion. He was concurrently started on oral anticoagulant warfarin. Heparin was given for 7 days until target INR range of 2–3 was reached. INR was 2.2 on the seventh day and he was discharged on warfarin. During the period of admission, he was continued on haloperidol, dose of which had to be increased to 10 mg/day for adequate control of psychotic symptoms. Trihexyphenidyl 2 mg/day was continued.

Outcome and follow-up

Symptoms of deep vein thrombosis was completely resolved. Patient was followed up in the psychiatry department for 6 months. He was well maintained on haloperidol 10 mg/day and trihexyphenidyl 2 mg/day. He had no recurrence of deep vein thrombosis during the follow-up period.

Discussion

Association between antipsychotic treatment and increased risk of thromboembolism had been recognised very soon after the antipsychotic properties of chlorpromazine was discovered in 1953.2 Since then, several case–control studies have further strengthened this association.3–5 The exact biological mechanism responsible for this adverse drug reaction is unknown. However, drug-induced sedation and restriction of motor activity, obesity, hyperprolactinemia, elevated phospholipid antibodies, elevated platelet aggregation, elevated plasma homocysteine levels caused by drug, are some of the mechanisms suggested to explain the association between antipsychotics and venous thrombosis.3 Increased epinephrine secretion during an acute psychotic episode could be another mechanism causing thromboembolic phenomena, though no experimental data is available to support this hypothesis.6

Risk for deep vein thrombosis is reported to be maximum in the first few months of antipsychotic therapy4 and more with atypical antipsychotics.7 Among atypical antipsychotics, highest risk is reported with clozapine.8 9 The risk is reported to be higher in younger patients.9 In some case reports, other second-generation antipsychotics like risperidone and olanzapine were also found to have association with venous thrombosis, and they reported the complication 2 weeks to 3 months after initiation of treatment.7 10

The relation between dose of antipsychotics and risk of thromboembolism is not clear. In some studies, dose-dependent relation was observed.8 11 However, there was no suggestion of an increased risk with increasing doses of antipsychotics in the case–control study by Zornberg and Jick. 4

In our patient, deep vein thrombosis was reported on the fourth day of therapy with low dose risperidone. As per Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale, the rating for the case was 7 which suggested probable adverse drug reaction associated with risperidone.12 Patient had taken only 8 mg of the drug over 4 days. The early onset of the complication and the low cumulative dose used in our patient could possibly suggest that deep vein thrombosis is unlikely to be a dose-related adverse reaction. Parker et al 5 in their nested case–control study had shown that antipsychotic therapy within the previous 24 months increased the risk of venous thromboembolism (OR=1.32). Our patient had taken haloperidol and trihexyphenidyl irregularly in the past 2 years.

Thromboembolic phenomena has been reported in the first week of therapy with drugs like chlorpromazine and clozapine.13 14 There are case reports of risperidone-induced venous thrombosis after 2 weeks of therapy.7 10 But extensive literature search did not yield a case report of deep vein thrombosis related to the first week of risperidone treatment. Our case highlights the importance of early monitoring of these patients for signs of deep vein thrombosis starting from the first day of initiation of a new drug. On clinical suspicion of deep vein thrombosis, drug should be stopped and substituted with amisulpiride or a conventional high potency antipsychotic.7

Learning points

  • Deep vein thrombosis is a rare but serious adverse effect of antipsychotic therapy and can occur even with low doses of risperidone.

  • Deep vein thrombosis can occur in the first few days of starting treatment with risperidone and monitoring these patients should start from first day itself.

  • Risk could be higher in those patients who had antipsychotic treatment in the past 2 years.

  • Clinical suspicion of deep vein thrombosis warrants discontinuation of risperidone and if necessary, substitution with amisulpiride or a conventional high potency drug like haloperidol.

Footnotes

  • Contributors KKR: clinical diagnosis and management of the case, conceptualisation of the case report and final revision. MG: review of lliterature and manuscript preparation.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Next of kin consent obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer